• Ciao Guest - You’ve landed at the ultimate Guzzi site. NEW FORUM REGISTRATIONS REQUIRE EMAIL ACTIVATION - CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER - Use the CONTACT above if you need help. New to the forum? For all new members, we require ONE post in the Introductions section at the bottom, in order to post in most of the other sections. ALWAYS TRY A SEARCH BEFORE STARTING A NEW TOPIC - Most questions you may have, have likely been already answered. DON'T BE A DRIVE-BY POSTER: As a common courtesy, check back in and reply within 24 hours, or your post will be deleted. Note there's decades of heavily experienced Guzzi professionals on this site, all whom happily give endless amounts of their VALUABLE time for free; BE COURTEOUS AND RESPECTFUL!
  • There is ZERO tolerance on personal attacks and ANY HYPERLINKS to PRODUCT(S) or other competing website(s), including personal pages, social media or other Forums. This ALSO INCLUDES ECU DIAGnostic software, questions and mapping. We work very hard to offer commercially supported products and to keep info relevant here. First offense is a note, second is a warning, third time will get you banned from the site. We don't have the time to chase repeat (and ignorant) offenders. This is NOT a social media platform; It's an ad-free, privately funded website, in small help with user donations. Be sure to see the GTM STORE link above; ALL product purchases help support the site, or you can upgrade your Forum profile or DONATE via the link above.
  • Be sure to see the GTM STORE link also above for our 700+ product inventory, including OEM parts and many of our 100% Made-in-SoCal-USA GTM products and engine kits. In SoCal? Click the SERVICE tab above for the best in service, tires, tuning and installation of our products or custom work, and don't miss our GT MotoCycles® (not) art on the BUILDS tab above. WE'RE HERE ONLINE ONLY - NO PHONE CALLS MADE OR RECEIVED - DO NOT EMAIL AND ASK QUESTIONS OR ASK TO CALL YOU.
  • Like the new V100, GuzziTech is full throttle into the future! We're now running on an all-new server and we've updated our Forum software. The visual differences are obvious, but hopefully you'll notice the super-fast speed. If you notice any glitches or have any issues, please post on the Site Support section at the bottom. If you haven't yet, please upgrade your account which is covered in the Site Support section or via the DONATE tab above, which gives you full site access including the DOWNLOADS section. We really appreciate every $ and your support to keep this site ad-free. Create an account, sign in, upgrade your account, and enjoy. See you on the road in 2024.

Clutch thrust bearing on 8V's

Penis Rotor

GT Godfather!
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
2,833
Location
Bungendore, NSW Australia
The factory released a service bulletin a few months back about the thrust bearing on some 8V's most notably early Stelvios and Grisos becomming noisy in service. While no further explanation was really given it was obvious that the bearings were failing in some cases and the sollution was said to be to replace the whole thrust assembley with a new one with two bearings that has a superceeded part number to the original.

Now MarkIII who posts here was having some problems with his clutch on his 8VG, we found out last week that they were in fact unconnected with the thrust issue but since it was something that had been mentioned by the factory I went ahead and ordered the new part that comes as a complete assembly, supposedly a new thrust cup and two bearings. Well, they weren't in stock so they went on BO and duly arrived a couple of week later. Unfortunately they only has ONE bearing in the kit!!!! :roll:

Last week when we pulled the swingarm on Mark's bike to get at the slave cylinder and thrust mechanism we found no problem with his thrust mechanism but in for a penny? In for a pound! We used the original bearing and the new one as shown on the service bulletin. His clutch pushrod length was correct but interestingly, even though adding another bearing effectively increases the length of the thrust mechanism by 4mm there is no suggestion that anything else in the system needs altering.

This is by the by, the whole thing went back together fine and we then found the source of the problem that Mark said he'd probably post about but I'd also bought a second thrust assembley to put in stock and today did a bit of measuring only to find that the actual thrust cup is identical to the 'Old' one, hence the extra length in the mechanism which means that rather than buying the $80 assembley from Guzzi all one actually NEEDS to do if you want to add another bearing is go to the bearing factor and purchase a 10 x 24 x 4 Torrington and while I have yet to purchase one it'll sure as shit be cheaper than $80 :mrgreen:

Pete
 
pete roper said:
The factory released a service bulletin a few months back about the thrust bearing on some 8V's most notably early Stelvios and Grisos becomming noisy in service.
The symptoms would only be if the lever starts to get hard to pull right?


pete roper said:
We used the original bearing and the new one as shown on the service bulletin. His clutch pushrod length was correct but interestingly, even though adding another bearing effectively increases the length of the thrust mechanism by 4mm there is no suggestion that anything else in the system needs altering.
Pete


Are there supposed to be 3 bearing in all?
 

Attachments

  • Clutch.jpg
    Clutch.jpg
    230.3 KB · Views: 1,372
That pic shows one bearing and two races. With the new set up you end up with a second bearing piggy-backed on the first so you get race, bearing, race, bearing, race.

Pete
 
So there is more than 4mm (bearing + race) introduced to the total length of the assembly?

I am quite surprise to learn that the clutch actuation assembly can accommodate the extra 4mm+

As the clutch push rod came in 4 lengths with 1.5mm increments, which I think allowing a +/- 1.5mm error. Wouldn’t the additional 4mm in the thrust bearing pack preload the pushrod?

Phang

trustbearing2.jpg
 
I think that the different rod lengths are there to compensate for different diaphragm spring preloads due to manufacuring tollerances rather than the abillity of the slave cylinder to cope with extra travel.

I could be completely wrong on that. The addition of an extra bearing will be for speed reasons rather than load but all I can immagine is that people who slip their clutches alot would be more likely to experience problems with the single bearing set up than the twin.

Pete
 
pete roper said:
I think that the different rod lengths are there to compensate for different diaphragm spring preloads due to manufacuring tollerances rather than the abillity of the slave cylinder to cope with extra travel.

It make sense Pete
smiley_emoticons_thumbs-up_new.gif


Do the later machines come with twin bearing setup :?:

Phang
 
I believe I have the same issue "thrust bearings". Is the main symptom a high pitch whinning sound coming from the area around the alternator?

It happens to me when I come off throttle. If I change gears while this sound is being made, the sounds stops.

Thanks,

Patric
 
Thrust bearings are at the back of the gearbox. Logic would dictate that if there is a bearing noise from the region of the alternator it is most likely to be an alternator bearing. Having said that what you'te describing has the symptoms of belt slip. Have you checked the tension of your belt?

Pete
 
pete roper said:
I think that the different rod lengths are there to compensate for different diaphragm spring preloads due to manufacuring tollerances rather than the abillity of the slave cylinder to cope with extra travel.

I could be completely wrong on that. The addition of an extra bearing will be for speed reasons rather than load but all I can immagine is that people who slip their clutches alot would be more likely to experience problems with the single bearing set up than the twin.

Pete

Pete,

may i resurrect this topic? While disassembling swing arm for grease check I took the opportunity to check the clutch thrust bearing, too. While inserting gears my late 2010 Griso Tenni made from day one on very heavy "clonks" esp. when getting warmer. This even get's a little bit worse after now 14.000 Km. What i'm asking me, if it will help to pack up the clutch thrust with one more bearing in a sense of a precautionary action or say "can not harm". I have sufficient new bearings/races at hand…
 
Adding another bearing will make absolutely no difference to how it changes gears or how much it 'Clonks' when you select a different ratio.

The 8V six speeds don't have a driveline shock absorber in the gearbox or rear wheel. They are always going to be noisy. Removing as much play as possible from the throttle cables makes throttle control more sensitive and will help minimise the racket but really its a matter of practice makes perfect.

Quite early in the piece there was a rash of failures of thrust bearings in Europe, (Why is it always in Europe?) and for some reason the factory suggested adding another bearing. I've never understood why as having another bearing won't reduce the pressure, only the speed at which it runs. Since then and long before your bike was built the clutch was re-designed with a lighter spring so the bearing is loaded less. There is also the fact that by adding another bearing you effectively alter the length of the pushrod so unless you have the pushrod length calibrating tool and all four pushrods you could be making a 'Rod' for your own back. (sorry for the dreadful pun!)

My advice? Leave it alone!

Pete
 
pete roper said:
Adding another bearing will make absolutely no difference to how it changes gears or how much it 'Clonks' when you select a different ratio.

The 8V six speeds don't have a driveline shock absorber in the gearbox or rear wheel. They are always going to be noisy. Removing as much play as possible from the throttle cables makes throttle control more sensitive and will help minimise the racket but really its a matter of practice makes perfect.

Quite early in the piece there was a rash of failures of thrust bearings in Europe, (Why is it always in Europe?) and for some reason the factory suggested adding another bearing. I've never understood why as having another bearing won't reduce the pressure, only the speed at which it runs. Since then and long before your bike was built the clutch was re-designed with a lighter spring so the bearing is loaded less. There is also the fact that by adding another bearing you effectively alter the length of the pushrod so unless you have the pushrod length calibrating tool and all four pushrods you could be making a 'Rod' for your own back. (sorry for the dreadful pun!)

My advice? Leave it alone!

Pete

Thank you for your fast and comprehensive advice, it helps me a lot!

Dietrich
 
I'm replacing my thrust bearing with a double bearing set up soon, what ,if any, grease are you supposed to use in the thrust bearing ? Can't find any info in the service manual regarding greasing this bearing.
Thanks
 
I'm replacing my thrust bearing with a double bearing set up soon, what ,if any, grease are you supposed to use in the thrust bearing ? Can't find any info in the service manual regarding greasing this bearing.
Thanks

The bearing is lubricated by the gearbox oil. I would just apply some oil to it on installation.
 
Can anyone provide more information about the infamous double bearing tech bulletin? What engine numbers did this affect?
I cannot quite figure the logic in this "fix." If there was a bearing problem, I would think simply replacing the one bearing would be the fix. Also, do the new 8V's come with two of these bearings or one?
Regarding the added length to the pushing mechanism that the extra bearing creates, there may be a "stop" on the pushrod intermediate piece that delegates added clutch pressure only to the pushrod and not the added items between the slave cylinder and the pushrod assembly.
I'd like to know more about this. With my bike closing in on 35,000 miles, I may be noticing some wear or breaking-in of my pushrod assembly and need to add one of great length. I have no bearing noise or clutch groan etc., though.
 
What engine numbers did this affect?
I cannot quite figure the logic in this "fix." If there was a bearing problem, I would think simply replacing the one bearing would be the fix. Also, do the new 8V's come with two of these bearings or one?
Regarding the added length to the pushing mechanism that the extra bearing creates, there may be a "stop" on the pushrod intermediate piece that delegates added clutch pressure only to the pushrod and not the added items between the slave cylinder and the pushrod assembly.
I'd like to know more about this. With my bike closing in on 35,000 miles, I may be noticing some wear or breaking-in of my pushrod assembly and need to add one of great length. I have no bearing noise or clutch groan etc., though.
With the Tech Bulletin info being NLA online, tough to say. I don't think any of the VIN's were documented that I am aware of. I would say the bearings are very long life... close to 100k miles or more. That said, if you're in there, couldn't hurt to replace them I suppose.
My guess as to length difference is that since it's a hydraulic system/slave cylinder, the slave simply is able to absorb the difference. I would peruse the parts lists between the older and newer versions. Post on what you find out.
 
With the Tech Bulletin info being NLA online, tough to say. I don't think any of the VIN's were documented that I am aware of. I would say the bearings are very long life... close to 100k miles or more. That said, if you're in there, couldn't hurt to replace them I suppose.
My guess as to length difference is that since it's a hydraulic system/slave cylinder, the slave simply is able to absorb the difference. I would peruse the parts lists between the older and newer versions. Post on what you find out.
May I, instigate a re-resurrection of this topic.
After my Son lost clutch pressure on his 2010 Norge (actually probably manufactured in late 2009) we dismantled the rear end and removed the slave cylinder, confirming the leak that we suspected existed. The cause of the leak was actually that the thrust bearing had disintegrated and the thrust cylinder that acts upon it had begun to rotate, causing the piston of the slave cylinder to rotate and cause damage to the wall of the piston housing.
O.K. we thought. We'll simply pull out the old bearing, with it's washers and replace the assembly, including the thrust cylinder and slave cylinder. Easy? No? Because the manual says that the bearing assembly comes out of the bore towards the rear of the bike, and backs this up with a picture. Not so, however. It turns out that the outer washer of the bearing assy has a smaller diameter than the bearing race, so that it comes out to the rear but the race doesn't. This means that we now must remove the engine, in order to remove the gearbox which we'll have to open to remove the thrust bearing race (or what remains of it).
Sorry for being so long-winded, but I was wondering if someone who has replaced their thrust bearing could tell me what the outer diameter was/is, and also of the washers? Reading previous posts, the temptation is to source a bearing assy of 22 mm O.D. (not really a standard size) and fit it against the remains of the old race, and avoid all the work. Not really a good engineering solution though.
Any advice or opinions greatly appreciated.
Brian

P.S. I have just read a post by Pete that gives the part no.s of the bearings and I see that it's 24 mm O.D. The bore to the rear of this gearbox is 22 mm and this was the diameter of the outer washer. The race is positioned beyond a step in the bore where it becomes 24 mm. I don't like this as an arrangement, apart at all from it causing me to have to remove the gearbox

Brian
 
Last edited:
P.S. I have just read a post by Pete that gives the part no.s of the bearings and I see that it's 24 mm O.D. The bore to the rear of this gearbox is 22 mm and this was the diameter of the outer washer. The race is positioned beyond a step in the bore where it becomes 24 mm. I don't like this as an arrangement, apart at all from it causing me to have to remove the gearbox

Brian


This is crazy design. Time to shoot the engineer that designed this.
 
Back
Top