Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have ~35 years experience in suspension tuning (27 racing), and 20+ years in Guzzi specific modification. See the Archive tab above for more info.
In short:
Front wheel travel: 130mm/3 = 43.33mm target total travel with you seated.
Rear wheel travel: 89mm/3 = 29.66mm target total travel with you seated.
Yours:
Front: 26mm
Rear: 38mm
So WAY too firm in front, and too soft in the rear. So add preload on the rear shocks, and you'll have to change out the springs and experiment with the fork oil weight, unless you dig into the internals. Are your forks the damping adjust type on the top, or like the Jackal/Stone with no adjusters on top?
Once sag is sorted then you have to balance the damping. I could save people a TON of time in wasting money, as I've been there done that 10x over on the Tonti.
Welcome, and you won’t get far on the front without digging into them. Happy to be of help direct email with available options, but the adjustable forks only leave this one easy option of just fork springs; https://gtmotocycles.com/collections/suspension/products/california-1100-s-fork-kit - or you can go down the path I did almost 18 years ago, and it took me ~5 years to figure out in a mediocre sense.THANK YOU.
This gives me a solid starting point.
I do have the rebound and compression adjusters on top.
Answered my question!Welcome, and you won’t get far on the front without digging into them. Happy to be of help direct email with available options, but the adjustable forks only leave this one outside of just fork springs; https://gtmotocycles.com/collections/suspension/products/california-1100-s-fork-kit
I will add my two cents, because, why not. It is free, so it is worth what you paid for it.
Your preload looks about right based on the amount of sag under just the weight of the bike. But, as Todd said, your sag with you on board is too little up front and too much out back. That means your front springs are too stiff and your rear springs are too soft. You can play with preload to adjust the sag with you on board, but adding preload (or removing it) does not change the rate of your springs. And your front springs appear to be too stiff while your rear springs appear to be too soft. Preload can make it better than it is, but only different springs are really going to make it right.
Well, I prefer stiffer, so I would try one step softer in the rear. Also, you don't have a lot of rear travel available, so I would want less rear sag which would leave more travel available to absorb bumps. Finally, I like a higher ride height as it means more ground clearance.I just saw these responses, and they are very appreciated. So I should go stiffer rear spring, one step up I’m guessing. I have a free return on the springs, but will be reaching out to Todd for the front end. (Yikes) As far as the rears, I have these options:
“So if you have a black code 230 spring fitted which is too hard, then a code 249 (11/16/22) or code 613 (9/13/18) spring will give you a 'softer' ride quality.
We have the code 613 - the lighter of the 2 replacement spring options in stock, the code 249 springs will be back in stock the week commencing 8.4.19. Please let me know which one you would prefer, essentially a 'little' or a 'lot' softer in very basic terms.”
I have ~35 years experience in suspension tuning (27 racing), and 20+ years in Guzzi specific modification. See the Archive tab above for more info.
In short:
Front wheel travel: 130mm/3 = 43.33mm target total travel with you seated.
Rear wheel travel: 89mm/3 = 29.66mm target total travel with you seated.
Yours:
Front: 26mm
Rear: 38mm
So WAY too firm in front, and too soft in the rear. So add preload on the rear shocks, and you'll have to change out the springs and experiment with the fork oil weight, unless you dig into the internals. Are your forks the damping adjust type on the top, or like the Jackal/Stone with no adjusters on top?
Once sag is sorted then you have to balance the damping. I could save people a TON of time in wasting money, as I've been there done that 10x over on the Tonti.
Really difficult for me to track posts here for products. Email is best, or purchase online and I'll be in touch for specifics. click link above.Hey Todd - I think I’ll bite the bullet on the front end kit. What are the logical next steps? Thanks!
The way you tell if your springs are the right rate or not is by setting them to the required sag with you on the bike and then measuring the sag under just the weight of the bike itself. If your springs are too soft you will have too little sag under just the weight of the bike. That is because you had to add too much preload to the spring to get the sag where you want it. And adding preload does not make a spring stiffer, it only increases ride height.Ordered the good stuff, hopefully the last of the big ticket items. But hearing your feedback, it sounds worth it.
I managed to get the new set of Ikons from the original 38 to the 30mm sag on the rear. (Target of 29.66,as Todd states) I’m hoping it’s close enough, as I’m plum cashed out on this one for a while!
Crap, so I checked the sag under bike weight and I get very minimal. (1.59mm difference) so if I am understanding correctly, weight of bike 10-15, with rider 25-30, so close to half for each. Does the Shock length play a part at all, since the wheel hangs as far as the shock allows?The way you tell if your springs are the right rate or not is by setting them to the required sag with you on the bike and then measuring the sag under just the weight of the bike itself. If your springs are too soft you will have too little sag under just the weight of the bike. That is because you had to add too much preload to the spring to get the sag where you want it. And adding preload does not make a spring stiffer, it only increases ride height.
Generally, you want sag to be around 25 to 30 percent of total travel with you on the bike and around 10 to 15 percent under just the weight of the bike.
I would guess based on what you previously posted that now that rear sag with you on the bike is where you want it you likely have way too little sag under just the weight of the bike.
Shock length is not really directly part of the math, although it is a factor as the numbers are based on percentage of suspension travel and the length of the shock and it available travel determine overall suspension travel.Crap, so I checked the sag under bike weight and I get very minimal. (1.59mm difference) so if I am understanding correctly, weight of bike 10-15, with rider 25-30, so close to half for each. Does the Shock length play a part at all, since the wheel hangs as far as the shock allows?
Makes sense and thanks for sharing. Very good stuff.Shock length is not really directly part of the math, although it is a factor as the numbers are based on percentage of suspension travel and the length of the shock and it available travel determine overall suspension travel.
Your lack of sag was predictable based on the numbers you posted. As you add or remove preload to add or remove sag with you on the bike the same amount of sag is added or removed under just the weight of the bike. Running a spring that is nearly topped out under the weight of the bike is not going to work as well as your suspension should work, no matter what you do with dampening.
They offered to upgrade you to a different spring. I would take them up on it.
Adding or removing preload does not make the spring stiffer or softer. It only raises or lowers ride height. If you spring is too hard (or too soft) only a spring with a different rate will fix that.