Oaktree
Just got it firing!
Howdy all. I've been riding my BMW R1100R since she was new out of the box in June 2000. That was 161k miles ago, and counting. I'm looking now at what I should get as a new bike within the next two years. A long term investment requires long term planning.
I've been dyed in the wool BMW for many years. As a design engineer, I appreciate how easily maintainable the BMW is: the engineering is done very well. Minimalistic and robust. That's what I've always liked about the brand. What I haven't liked is the fact that I've gone through three final drive failures in 161k miles. I don't believe modern machinery should have that kind of drive train trouble. The 'broken axle' problem kinda went away in automobiles a few decades ago.
So, I was considering a new BMW GS, of course. While browsing the internet earlier this year for what was new for 2013, I learned that BMW is moving toward throttle-by wire. ...more whiz bang gadgetry, and a departure from simple reliability. It was during that internet digging that I stumbled across the Guzzi Stelvio NTX. It piqued my interest. Then I visited a dealer. I'm impressed.
What I like the most about the Stelivo is, once again, the engineering elegance. It is a simple, bare design. I've been doing my own maintenance on my R for 9 years, and I see in the Stelvio that a very similar design philosophy. I've worked on my two previous Honda's, and my wife's Triumph. Simplicity in design is the ultimate sophistication. It takes a lot of hard work to make something simple and functional. But the end result is likely something that works - and lasts. That's what I'm after in a motorcycle. Afterall, I really don't want to change horses until I can see 200,000 on the clock. I expect the same from my next ride.
What I've liked the most about the BMW ridability is the front telelever suspension. The Stelvio front end is nothing like it... more of a classic slider fork. I don't even see a fork brace. I haven't ridden one yet - would someone care to comment on the stability of the front end without even a cross brace? That's my biggest concern.
Another thing I like about the Stelvio is the absolutely gorgeous lines. Love the look of the bike. Sleek and rugged. Very unique. Would someone comment on the overall reliability of the latest model? Highest milage, anyone?
How does the bike hold up in snow / slush / salty winters? I ride year round here in north east MA. I stud my tires in the winter. The bimmer was six years old when we moved form SoCal to MA, so riding in the salty winters wasn't so much of a heart break. She gets a bath every year, and cleans up very well for an old lady. How robust is the Guzzi finish?
I'm sure there will be a lot of other questions, but if I'm serious enough to look this much away from BMW, I'm rather serious. I've liked what I've researched enough so far to join this forum... been lurking for about a week.
As I asked the salesman at Seacoast Sport Cycle in NH: "Why should I buy the Stelvio?"
I've been dyed in the wool BMW for many years. As a design engineer, I appreciate how easily maintainable the BMW is: the engineering is done very well. Minimalistic and robust. That's what I've always liked about the brand. What I haven't liked is the fact that I've gone through three final drive failures in 161k miles. I don't believe modern machinery should have that kind of drive train trouble. The 'broken axle' problem kinda went away in automobiles a few decades ago.
So, I was considering a new BMW GS, of course. While browsing the internet earlier this year for what was new for 2013, I learned that BMW is moving toward throttle-by wire. ...more whiz bang gadgetry, and a departure from simple reliability. It was during that internet digging that I stumbled across the Guzzi Stelvio NTX. It piqued my interest. Then I visited a dealer. I'm impressed.
What I like the most about the Stelivo is, once again, the engineering elegance. It is a simple, bare design. I've been doing my own maintenance on my R for 9 years, and I see in the Stelvio that a very similar design philosophy. I've worked on my two previous Honda's, and my wife's Triumph. Simplicity in design is the ultimate sophistication. It takes a lot of hard work to make something simple and functional. But the end result is likely something that works - and lasts. That's what I'm after in a motorcycle. Afterall, I really don't want to change horses until I can see 200,000 on the clock. I expect the same from my next ride.
What I've liked the most about the BMW ridability is the front telelever suspension. The Stelvio front end is nothing like it... more of a classic slider fork. I don't even see a fork brace. I haven't ridden one yet - would someone care to comment on the stability of the front end without even a cross brace? That's my biggest concern.
Another thing I like about the Stelvio is the absolutely gorgeous lines. Love the look of the bike. Sleek and rugged. Very unique. Would someone comment on the overall reliability of the latest model? Highest milage, anyone?
How does the bike hold up in snow / slush / salty winters? I ride year round here in north east MA. I stud my tires in the winter. The bimmer was six years old when we moved form SoCal to MA, so riding in the salty winters wasn't so much of a heart break. She gets a bath every year, and cleans up very well for an old lady. How robust is the Guzzi finish?
I'm sure there will be a lot of other questions, but if I'm serious enough to look this much away from BMW, I'm rather serious. I've liked what I've researched enough so far to join this forum... been lurking for about a week.
As I asked the salesman at Seacoast Sport Cycle in NH: "Why should I buy the Stelvio?"