scbikerdude
Just got it firing!
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2010
- Messages
- 7
OK, peer pressure got me to put it on the dyno. I really didn't care, I know it's not a rocket. But 69rwhp and 49ft-lbs is much lower than I expected. I know results can vary dyno to dyno, etc, but c'mon! It sure feels faster than that. I had an FZ1 that dynoed at 125rwhp and 74 ft=lbs and it wasn't that much faster (well, yes it was, but still!). They did tell me the ratio was rich (and you could smell it), that you want it around 14.1 and mine was not. So, evidently I have a place for improvement. For those of you that care:
It was a Mustang dyno
HP and TQ numbers were checked in 3rd gear
also, did a top speed run, and it said 132 mph. This may be exaggerated, since there is no wind resistance. He didn't want to do a 1/4 mile run (they have a christmas tree set up) because of the dry clutch, didn't want to burn it up (I guess because of the loading on the big drum under the rear wheel).
The good news is the speedometer is accurate!
Still like the bike, would like more power (of course, I can never have too much), but I know it is not financially possible for me right now and probably not feasible either.
Gary
It was a Mustang dyno
HP and TQ numbers were checked in 3rd gear
also, did a top speed run, and it said 132 mph. This may be exaggerated, since there is no wind resistance. He didn't want to do a 1/4 mile run (they have a christmas tree set up) because of the dry clutch, didn't want to burn it up (I guess because of the loading on the big drum under the rear wheel).
The good news is the speedometer is accurate!
Still like the bike, would like more power (of course, I can never have too much), but I know it is not financially possible for me right now and probably not feasible either.
Gary