youcanrunnaked
Tuned and Synch'ed
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2011
- Messages
- 33
pete roper said:Just call me 'Mr. Stupid'
Pete
I'll refrain.
Once again, your "response" bears no relation to what I posted. I am interested in gathering evidence and establishing facts. That's what an NHTSA report is designed to accomplish. It is not a "witch hunt," as you so quaintly describe it. We have been down this road before regarding what the NHTSA does and what a report involves. Why do you continue to rail against something that you know nothing about?
You continue to state that you have yet to see a secondary failure of the A8 or recalled A5 engines. Just because you have not seen something with your own eyes, does not mean that it didn't happen.
Every time one such failure is pointed out to you, you have the same response: "We don't know what oil was used... we don't know if the cam was shimmed correctly... we don't know what else might have caused this... well, it hasn't happened to any of MY customers.... " Kurt's bike had the recall done before delivery, and the valvetrain with the improved parts failed at three years and 26,000 miles. I am willing to bet that during that time Kurt used the proper oil, maintained his bike correctly, and that the first recall was done properly. If that's the case, then what is your excuse for this failure? By my reckoning, you are out of excuses.
Ironically, I agree with you; we need more facts. Now, why would you be against having an outside agency gather those facts? There can only be one of two reasons: paranoia or fear. IMO, neither is a very good reason.