• Ciao Guest - You’ve landed at the ultimate Guzzi site. NEW FORUM REGISTRATIONS REQUIRE EMAIL ACTIVATION - CHECK YOUR SPAM FOLDER - Use the CONTACT above if you need help. New to the forum? For all new members, we require ONE post in the Introductions section at the bottom, in order to post in most of the other sections. ALWAYS TRY A SEARCH BEFORE STARTING A NEW TOPIC - Most questions you may have, have likely been already answered. DON'T BE A DRIVE-BY POSTER: As a common courtesy, check back in and reply within 24 hours, or your post will be deleted. Note there's decades of heavily experienced Guzzi professionals on this site, all whom happily give endless amounts of their VALUABLE time for free; BE COURTEOUS AND RESPECTFUL!
  • There is ZERO tolerance on personal attacks and ANY HYPERLINKS to PRODUCT(S) or other competing website(s), including personal pages, social media or other Forums. This ALSO INCLUDES ECU DIAGnostic software, questions and mapping. We work very hard to offer commercially supported products and to keep info relevant here. First offense is a note, second is a warning, third time will get you banned from the site. We don't have the time to chase repeat (and ignorant) offenders. This is NOT a social media platform; It's an ad-free, privately funded website, in small help with user donations. Be sure to see the GTM STORE link above; ALL product purchases help support the site, or you can upgrade your Forum profile or DONATE via the link above.
  • Be sure to see the GTM STORE link also above for our 700+ product inventory, including OEM parts and many of our 100% Made-in-SoCal-USA GTM products and engine kits. In SoCal? Click the SERVICE tab above for the best in service, tires, tuning and installation of our products or custom work, and don't miss our GT MotoCycles® (not) art on the BUILDS tab above. WE'RE HERE ONLINE ONLY - NO PHONE CALLS MADE OR RECEIVED - DO NOT EMAIL AND ASK QUESTIONS OR ASK TO CALL YOU.
  • Like the new V100, GuzziTech is full throttle into the future! We're now running on an all-new server and we've updated our Forum software. The visual differences are obvious, but hopefully you'll notice the super-fast speed. If you notice any glitches or have any issues, please post on the Site Support section at the bottom. If you haven't yet, please upgrade your account which is covered in the Site Support section or via the DONATE tab above, which gives you full site access including the DOWNLOADS section. We really appreciate every $ and your support to keep this site ad-free. Create an account, sign in, upgrade your account, and enjoy. See you on the road in 2024.

Boooo on Boston Legislation

GTM®

Administrator
Staff member
GT di Razza Pura
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
15,134
Location
Malibu
Boston Outlaws Exhausts Without EPA Certification
Publish date: Jul 1, 2009

The City of Boston earlier this month enacted an ordinance outlawing motorcycle exhaust systems that are not approved for on-road use by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

According to the new law, passed June 3, "No person shall park, use or operate a motorcycle within the city of Boston, manufactured subsequent to Dec. 31, 1982, that does not bear the required applicable Federal EPA exhaust system label pursuant Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Volume 24, Part 205, Subparts D and Subpart E."

The Boston Police Department has the authority to fine any motorcycle that doesn't display the federally required label. All violations are punishable by a $300 fine.

In a June 1 note to the Boston City Council, Maureen Feeney, chair of the committee of government relations, wrote that the new law "would simply give local authorities a tool to better enforce existing noise standards."

City residents, representatives from the Boston Police Department, the Environment Department and the Transportation Department testified in support of the initiative at a May 26 public hearing. Residents in attendance at the hearing described how loud motorcycle noise disturbs the atmosphere of their neighborhoods, especially in areas like the historic North End, during warm months.

"This ordinance isn't creating a new noise standard, but simply providing a tool to increase local enforcement," Feeney wrote.

A group of motorcycle enthusiasts already are in the process of drawing up a lawsuit to have the new law removed.

"There are existing laws on the books at city and state level to enforce but the council went overboard on this," says motorcyclist Larry Cahill. "The absence of the imprint does not mean that the exhaust is loud. It just means that the manufacturer did not certify that the original motorcycle/muffler combination met the EPA standard. Oh, by the way — the certification is only valid for one year or 3,750 miles."

Boston isn't the only metropolitan area to enact such a law. Other local governments, including Denver and Fairfax County, Va., have enacted ordinances requiring exhaust system labels.
 
I see a burgeoning black market in compliance stickers and tags.
What would you expect from the largest city in a state that keeps electing Swimmer Kennedy and Purple Heart Kerry as Senators.:laugh:
 
RacerX wrote:
Boston Outlaws Exhausts Without EPA Certification
Publish date: Jul 1, 2009

The City of Boston earlier this month enacted an ordinance outlawing motorcycle exhaust systems that are not approved for on-road use by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

According to the new law, passed June 3, "No person shall park, use or operate a motorcycle within the city of Boston, manufactured subsequent to Dec. 31, 1982, that does not bear the required applicable Federal EPA exhaust system label pursuant Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Volume 24, Part 205, Subparts D and Subpart E."

The Boston Police Department has the authority to fine any motorcycle that doesn't display the federally required label. All violations are punishable by a $300 fine.

In a June 1 note to the Boston City Council, Maureen Feeney, chair of the committee of government relations, wrote that the new law "would simply give local authorities a tool to better enforce existing noise standards."

City residents, representatives from the Boston Police Department, the Environment Department and the Transportation Department testified in support of the initiative at a May 26 public hearing. Residents in attendance at the hearing described how loud motorcycle noise disturbs the atmosphere of their neighborhoods, especially in areas like the historic North End, during warm months.

"This ordinance isn't creating a new noise standard, but simply providing a tool to increase local enforcement," Feeney wrote.

A group of motorcycle enthusiasts already are in the process of drawing up a lawsuit to have the new law removed.

"There are existing laws on the books at city and state level to enforce but the council went overboard on this," says motorcyclist Larry Cahill. "The absence of the imprint does not mean that the exhaust is loud. It just means that the manufacturer did not certify that the original motorcycle/muffler combination met the EPA standard. Oh, by the way — the certification is only valid for one year or 3,750 miles."

Boston isn't the only metropolitan area to enact such a law. Other local governments, including Denver and Fairfax County, Va., have enacted ordinances requiring exhaust system labels.

Hmm, Do I detect a pattern here ? Anyone care to guess.
 
A group of motorcycle enthusiasts already are in the process of drawing up a lawsuit to have the new law removed.

Good luck! There are a lot of people out there who hate loud pipes (including many motorcyclists) so legislation like this is more likely to increase rather than get defeated.

I'm sure not for more laws - we have way too many already. If the noise problem is so bad, why not just enforce existing sound statutes (and maybe catch some cars and trucks in the process)?

Besides, don't the powers to be know that "loud pipes save lives"?
 
I have been to several different countries in my 42 years of heart beating, and it never seases to amaze me how much americans despise MC's. Instead of seeing us as a solution to polution, congestion etc... they enact laws to ban us and make life unbearable.

I am witnessing it first hand in NYC. Just 10 years ago MC's were everywhere. Now they are invisible. The have been ticketed into the dusty corners of the city. They set up check points with tractor trailers and immediatly impound any bike with any type of infration.

Makes me sad..

I believe, our bikes, like our guns (me any way) will soon be deemed to dangerous for us and be outlawed. May be not in my life time, but probably in my daughters for sure...
 
Re: Re:Boooo on Boston Legislation

WitchCityBallabio said:
Actually, we re-elect Kennedy because he is an excellent legislator.


I think you forgot to include the "laughing smiley face" after this statement. :lol:

I guess we all have different opinions and definitions of how we judge excellence of those voted into public office.

Charlie
 
Hmmm, Maybe the loud pipes aren't really saving lives. It's a life style, if you have to ask you wouldn't get. As Pogo possum once said, "we have met the enemy, and they are us" I, for one. am all in favor of blaming Kennedy or Kerry or anyone else for that matter. Those BASTARDS!
 
well i agree there seems to be an anti bike theme against bikes. apparently there are 100000 bikes in nz but i only ever see about 5 a day in auckland the largest city here, they seem to want to tax them to death here, about guns, there wunderful things but i'd rather have 5 motorcycles than the 5 guns some of my friends have!
 
You think you've got it bad - I think it's the same all over now, here in Europe for instance:

Quote: "Among those measures, which are designed to bring extra cash to the national government of each member state, we could soon see all bikers across Europe having to wear high-visibility fluorescent vests, as well as banning the same bikers from servicing their motorbikes and scooters themselves, but having the job done by a registered mechanic instead. Those who currently service their bike themselves, including changing brakes, tyres and replacing defective parts, could soon be facing fines and prosecution under European rules if they fail to bring their motorcycle to a registered mechanic. Motorcyclenews.com report that Engine Control Units (ECUs), which govern fuel supply, could become sealed to prevent tampering, and exhausts could get bolts and could only be removed by dealers with specialised tools, according to the Federation of European Motorcyclists’ Associations (FEMA). All new motorbikes and scooters over 125cc will have ABS from 2017 under the plans, while smaller models will have to have either ABS or linked front and rear brakes."

A bit of scaremongering from a Motorcycle rag but there does seem to be a common (worldwide?) governmental push to alienate bikers from the rest of society, or even eradicate them altogether via legislation with never any mention of the fact that they may be 'greener' than most other forms of transport (even with 'perfomance' tuning).

I wish I didn't but I see a sad future for my kids, missing out on all the fun to be had with mucking about with bikes.
 
By the time any such legislation will pass here in South Carolina, I'll be too old to be riding anyhow - I guess it's one of the advantages of living well South of the Mason-Dixon line! :laugh:
 
Spaghetti Power said:
I am witnessing it first hand in NYC.

There a study about the positive impact of 2 wheeled vehicles in NYC reprinted in the Sept. 2007 MGNOC newsletter. (available on-line to members) In my area the vast majority of unbearably loud bikes are H-Ds. I don't think noise laws are enforced because cops do the same thing or they are H-D riders themselves - just a guess.

CA has a similar law going into effect by the end of the year, a law signed by our wonderful former gubbernator, which does not include regulation of the thousand of trucks and SUVs with illegal exhaust! But it's not retro active like the Boston law. Its frustrating, I think the new laws are designed to make it easy to issue a citation. My guess is that the way things stand now if a cop gives some one a excessive noise ticket would turn into a court battle.

Dark tinted window are illegal in CA as well but you still see cars driving around with nearly opaque windows.

Are bikes easier targets? Smaller group with less political power?
 
Motorcycle riding promotes thinking out of ordinary boundaries.
This is not acceptable and must be contained the most quiet way possible.

Fifteen years ago our EU martial ruler, the Commision, tried to push legislation that would oblige every rider wear yellow fluorescent jacket and every bike be equiped with leg-protector fenders, no exceptions, period. This was being pushed by a well known car lobbying commision member.
It was fiercefully battled by European Parliament members (one making a lengthy political speech in the parliament dressed up in full leather reacing wear and holding a helmet) and since then the ambitious bike-killer plan was put on ice.
Though, they pressed smog rules that were too tight for the engine space confined motorcycles and this killed a lot of fine models here and has been escalating ever since eventhough the number of commuting mototrcycles is relatively small.
Too tight rules are a fascist way of impementing you totalarian will: Because of absyrd tightenss, everybody eventually becomes illegal so an extavagant fine or unessary violent force is ok and by the book and nobody reacts.
Feck the fecking feckers.
 
There is definitely a drive to bridle motorcycles the same way cars are - tinkering is allowed but only as far as it affects aesthetic (tastes differ...) trinklets. It's not completely illogical: roadworthiness testing is a crucial thing esp. given today's traffic (anyone on here in favour of allowing just about any driver/rider on the roads they share?), and too much tinkering freedom could cancel all the benefits.
That said, there's considerable lobbying going on to ensure sufficient freedom remains to allow modification, for instance through aftermarket parts that are homologated.


PS: loud pipes are much better at attracting badwill than saving lifes...!
 
I saw this shirt and had to buy it.
TS001Ox.jpg

Unfortunately it's such a cheap quality shirt it started coming apart after only a few washings.

johnk
 
Although the proposed regulation may not be ideal, I can sympathize with the intent, from first-hand experience. I live in Scituate, RI, and my patio, where I like to have dinner on summer evenings, is about 1/4 mile from state route 116. This road passes through my rural area and borders a very large reservoir, and it is an ideal road for summer evening motorcycling. I ride it often. Whenever one of those perpetual little boys on a large, needlessly loud bike roars through, it rattles my eardrums, freaks my cats, disturbs the backyard birds, and generally destroys the bucolic bliss. We do have noise laws, but the local constabulary doesn't enforce them, so perhaps outlawing the fitting of ineffective exhaust systems would make more sense.
 
I live two blocks from a biker bar (mainly Hardley Ableson) and on nice evenings when you would like to be sitting back enjoy the tranquility you cannot. They seem to think everybody else wants to hear them and/or is impressed.
South Park summed it up nicely when they changed the meaning of the word "Fag" to " An extremely annoying, inconsiderate person most commonly associated with Harley riders." or " A loud and obnoxious person who owns or frequently rides a Harley."
With loud pipes comes responsibility. Responsibility to not annoy everyone else within earshot of you.
It is primarily lack of responsible use of loud pipes that brings on draconian laws and rules. And while I do not support such rules I think you would have to be clueless to not see them coming.
Then there are the people with agendas.....
 
Back
Top