I love the fact that in Fahrenheit, the only show 2 digits "02" instead of "102"
I just noticed this on my bike in ride here in California today....
I just noticed this on my bike in ride here in California today....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks! I like to verify what the electronics are reading with a new bike at first so I can trust this. by vrifying by the old "analog" method where I take a picture of the trip odometer, and what I have on the reciept for gallons over 4-5 fill ups for mileage, to confirm what the computer is calculating. As the old saying goes "Trust, but verify" There are plenty of places I've been that knowing this is a good thingDang… that’s hot!
You’re getting decent mileage. Seems to be in the 43-48 range for many (200 mile range was my hope, so I’m happy). It’s like dollar cost averaging I guess.
Just thought it would be fun to compare notes since it’s a new bike/design. Thx
British gallon is "Imperial" measurement which is roughly 20% more than US measurement. Something got lost on the way across the Atlantic............I have an average of 0,49ltr/10km.
Thats 48mpg (US), and 57mpg (Brittish).
Why the h*ck is there both US and Brittish standards?
I can confirm that it seems to pull really well to the limit.British gallon is "Imperial" measurement which is roughly 20% more than US measurement. Something got lost on the way across the Atlantic............
I just hit the 932 mile break in mileage and recorded in the dash is 48.5 mpg on a round trip of about 260 miles from 1200 ft above sea level to about 5500 ft. Also, at about 945 miles I opend it up on a flat section on a one way highway south bound, and no traffic in front in sixth gear, and ran up to 122 mph, and was still pulling bretty hard........
What averages are you seeing? According to the dash my average MPG is around 40mpg US, but when I do the math at fill-ups I'm only getting 32mpg. I'm quite heavy handed as well and speeds in NorCal are quite fast in general, but it's disappointing as my effective range is just north of 150. While I don't care about the economics, from a practical standpoint that's not enough to safely get me through some long stretches through national parks without reliable gas stations.My average is pretty low... but I'm heavy handed.
Hi , Yes, correct had my satnav on, always showed 5mph less than speedo.Has anyone tested the accuracy of the odometer? I've tested the speedometer and mine is +5mph at actual 75mph. If the odometer is equally optimistic then you can take 8-ish% off your mpg or l/km.
I have seen that video, and thought I saved it but cannot find it now. When I had my 2000 RC51, I once let it eat on a familiar road about 125 miles north of where I live and saw 182 mph indicated on the speedometer, all tucked down chin just above the tank. I don't think I would do that anymore but some day I will probably take the V100 somewhere near to, or past 140 mph when I get more miles on the clock. The motor is a joy between 4000 and 8000 rpm and no need to wring it's neck higher in the rev band.I can confirm that it seems to pull really well to the limit.
Not pulled it to the top myself yet, but in a similar occasion like yours even with hard side panniers it seems to be able pull to the top rev limit.
I mean, it doesn’t struggle or loose power at those high speeds.
Seen a video where a guy pulls it to just in the red area at the revs.
He did 245km/h on the onboard speedo.
That’s about 152mph.
If I’m not mistaken the theoretical top speed is around 240km/h (149mph).
The V100 is a brisk thing if you get in the mood, although most natural in sensible driving speed.
I have seen that video, and thought I saved it but cannot find it now. When I had my 2000 RC51, I once let it eat on a familiar road about 125 miles north of where I live and saw 182 mph indicated on the speedometer, all tucked down chin just above the tank. I don't think I would do that anymore but some day I will probably take the V100 somewhere near to, or past 140 mph when I get more miles on the clock. The motor is a joy between 4000 and 8000 rpm and no need to wring it's neck higher in the rev band.
LOL…I have a habit to save all videos I can on the V100
I'd probably have been a little more interested in the tpms light popping on in the middle of that run lol.
It is good to know the V100 handles that road (and presumably other similar roads) well because I am not excited by the new BMW’s. My R1150 RS handles those corners well, but it has different suspension than the 1200. I am still trying to find the best suspension settings for twisty pavement and also for dirt roads for my V85TT, but I was pleasantly surprised how well it handled that road when I was on it a couple weeks ago.
But seriously, the bike "hides" its speed very well. There are some long sweepers coming down from Payson to Mesa (probably well known to GmaninAZ) where I find myself going at over 100 mph (160 kph) without noticing. The R1200 RS was very twitchy in those curves and you really had to push the bike down hard to make them.
It is good to know the V100 handles that road (and presumably other similar roads) well because I am not excited by the new BMW’s. My R1150 RS handles those corners well, but it has different suspension than the 1200. I am still trying to find the best suspension settings for twisting pavement and also for dirt roads for my V85TT, but I was pleasantly surprised how well it handled that road when I was on it a couple weeks ago.