Kev M
Cruisin' Guzzisti
GrahamNZ wrote:
Interesting thought, but the sensor itself must be operating within parameters - otherwise it would have logged a trouble code no?
So if the sensor is sending the type of signals it is supposed to, then the sensor ITSELF wouldn't be the problem.
Now what does the sensor take it's reading's FROM, i.e. what part of the crankshaft or flywheel? Is it a reluctor, taking readings from a magnet or from a cutout in the metal component. The only way timing would be off then would be mechanically, if the magnet or cutout was in the wrong position - a mistake in machining. Unlikely, but possible I guess.
More importantly, as I've noted, I can make the problem go away at will, IF I CAN FIND A GAS STATION WITHOUT E-10 - it goes away INSTANTLY... If it were a sensor or timing wheel problem, it wouldn't go away. Right?
Well, unless the issue is that it's a SLIGHT mechanical problem, like borderline of spec, which is fine with conventional gas and exasperated by E10 - the fuel in that case is the straw that breaks the camel's back.
And honestly, that's what I'm thinking - I'm thinking that the stock mapping is just plain borderline too lean, with enough spark advance for performance, that when you add a E10 and wind up with an even leaner mixture, you're just plain moving out of the stock parameters enough to cause this.
Although I have no need/desire for a PCIII (or PCIV or PCV or whatever number they are up to now) from a performance perspective, I suspect I may have to add one if/when they finally have one for these bikes just from a rideability standpoint.
Kev
Kev
Good to have that aspect put to bed.
Apart from the items I and others have listed as possible pinging causes I wonder if anyone has had experience with checking the crankshaft position sensor?? If that is out or faulty it could lead to incorrect ignition timing and consequent pinging. Oh, for the simplicity of distributor points!
Graham
Interesting thought, but the sensor itself must be operating within parameters - otherwise it would have logged a trouble code no?
So if the sensor is sending the type of signals it is supposed to, then the sensor ITSELF wouldn't be the problem.
Now what does the sensor take it's reading's FROM, i.e. what part of the crankshaft or flywheel? Is it a reluctor, taking readings from a magnet or from a cutout in the metal component. The only way timing would be off then would be mechanically, if the magnet or cutout was in the wrong position - a mistake in machining. Unlikely, but possible I guess.
More importantly, as I've noted, I can make the problem go away at will, IF I CAN FIND A GAS STATION WITHOUT E-10 - it goes away INSTANTLY... If it were a sensor or timing wheel problem, it wouldn't go away. Right?
Well, unless the issue is that it's a SLIGHT mechanical problem, like borderline of spec, which is fine with conventional gas and exasperated by E10 - the fuel in that case is the straw that breaks the camel's back.
And honestly, that's what I'm thinking - I'm thinking that the stock mapping is just plain borderline too lean, with enough spark advance for performance, that when you add a E10 and wind up with an even leaner mixture, you're just plain moving out of the stock parameters enough to cause this.
Although I have no need/desire for a PCIII (or PCIV or PCV or whatever number they are up to now) from a performance perspective, I suspect I may have to add one if/when they finally have one for these bikes just from a rideability standpoint.
Kev